If I understood the news correctly, this potential new development depends on using semi-conductors with super-conductivity. Fusion has a long history of being Brazil: 30 years away, always has been always will. If this development pans out, which we may know in as soon as 3 years, we would be 15-30 years away from viable fusion energy.
Please note that nuclear fusion is not a fantasy. Fusion reactions have been sustained on Earth for decades. What we haven’t been able to do yet is to extract more energy than needed to contain the reactions. This may change. Big MAYBE, but something worth watching.
Science is knowledge. Knowledge is power. And power is inherently political.
I am currently reading Fool Me Twice: Fighting the Assault on Science in America, by Shawn Lawrence Otto, which has been on my bookshelf for a couple years. I should have read it two years ago. Otto doesn’t fail to deliver dozens of quotable moments. Nor does he pull any punches.
In the years following Sagan’s drubbing by the very National Academy whose president had called for increased science outreach, the public’s one-shining perception of science continued to erode. By 1999, less than half of all Americans–just 47 percent–said that scientific advances were one of the country’s most important achievements. By 2009 that number had fallen to only 27 percent.
Sagan’s rejection became a poignant and symbolic example of how scientists had lost a sense of the value of their relationship to the society around the, a relationship that was critical to their future and the future of the country–but that was slipping through their fingers even as they voted against him…
Science has delivered more than half of US economic growth since the end of WWII, and has contributed to solving important global challenges, including global health and feeding the world. Moreover, today science plays a central role in solving the world’s most important challenges, including global climate change and destruction of the oceans (acidification and overfishing). Meanwhile, US Congress as scientifically deficient as ever in history.
Tempting as it is to blame this horrendous situation on religious leaders, lawyers, economists, politicians, and corporate executives, scientists have to direct some of the blame at themselves.
Living our values means understanding. It means we have to think about our values and understand what are their effects.
It means analyzing why we hold them.
It means deciding how to apply those values to our lives. It means eliminating old habits and creating new ones.
It means eliminating the distractions and focusing on what is most important and consistent with those values.
It means doing, changing. Not talking, not pretending.
It means destroying and creating. It is creativity. It means where you end up may be nothing like you imagined at the start.
Fighting for our values means forcing others to live our values within the cross-hairs of our loaded guns. Whether they like it or not.
When discussing values, most people get busy loading and aiming.